Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Richardson v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 23, 1984No. 2-183A7Published

1ConcurrenceBuchanan, Chief Judge

I concur in the result in this case. I do not agree that the certainty of economic injury is ever a factor to be considered in determining the suitability of offered employment.

My conclusion is easily reached by looking no further than the effect of the statute's use of the term "shall" and the rule of expressio unius est exclusio alterius. The crucial portions of Indiana's unemployment compensation legislation read as follows:

"(a) In determining whether or not any such work is suitable for an individual, the division shall consider the degree of risk involved to such individual's health,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Bingham v. Home Brewing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Ball v. Review Board of Indiana Employment Security DivisionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Osborne v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API