Legal Opinion

Whipple v. Township of Teaneck

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 20, 1947PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

McGeehan, J.

This appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court which dismissed the writ of certiorari theretofore allowed on the application of appellant.

On July 17th, 1945, Frederic Andreas and Mabel Moore Andreas, his wife, executed a deed conveying certain premises in Teaneck to the Township of Teaneck. The granting clause states, “for and in consideration of one and 00/100 Dollar and other good and valuable consideration, do hereby give, grant * * *” and the habendum clause, “* * * subject, however, to the following reservations, exceptions,…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jamouneau v. Division of Tax AppealsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
  2. Switz v. KingsleyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  3. Cane v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Teaneck Tp. v. Division of Tax AppealsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  5. S.J. Associates, Ltd. v. East Windsor TownshipNew Jersey Tax Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API