HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v. Navin
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The defendant Jeffrey Navin1 appeals from the judgment of strict foreclosure rendered by *709the trial court following the granting of a motion for summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff, HSBC Bank USA, N.A. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court erred by granting summary judgment because (1) the plaintiff was not the owner of the promissory note and mortgage at the time that it commenced the foreclosure action and thus lacked standing, (2) a genuine issue of material fact existed as to whether the plaintiff possessed the assignment of the promissory note and mortgage at the…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Lone Star Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Chase Home Finance, LLC v. FequiereConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Town of New Hartford v. Connecticut Resources Recovery AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Brown and Brown, Inc. v. BlumenthalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Megin v. Town of New MilfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by10 opinions
- GMAC Mortgage, LLC v. FordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- RMS Residential Properties, LLC v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- HSBC BANK USA v. NavinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP v. Diane CreedConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- U.S. Bank National Assn. v. ChristophersenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.