Legal Opinion

Eckford-El v. Toombs

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided March 27, 1991No. 1:90cv 794PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HILLMAN, Senior District Judge.

This is a civil rights action brought by a state prisoner pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff is presently incarcerated at the Ionia Maximum Correctional Facility (IMCF). Defendants are six officials of IMCF. Plaintiff’s pro se complaint alleges that his First Amendment rights were violated when defendants rejected written materials sent to plaintiff by another inmate. Defendants rejected the materials as being in violation of policy directive PD-BCF-63.-03, which prohibits inmates from entering into certain contractual arrangements. Plaintiff seeks…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Continental Development Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1999
  2. Markva v. HavemanDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
  3. Mid-Century Insurance v. FishDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2010
  4. Crehan v. DavisDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2010
  5. Slusher v. CarsonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2007

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API