People v. Curry
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*744Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally insufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt of criminal mischief in the third degree beyond a reasonable doubt (see People v Powell, 101 AD3d 756 [2012] [decided herewith]). The evidence was insufficient to establish, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the damage to the subject property exceeded the sum of $250 (see Penal Law § 145.05 [2]; People v Quigley, 70 AD3d 1411,1412 [2010]; People v Jeffries, 151 AD2d 964 [1989]). Although this issue is…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. FeingoldNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. GonzalezNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. PradoNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- People v. TabbNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. CasianoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. DelvillartronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. FentonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. DelvillartronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. FentonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.