Garayua v. New York City Police Department
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The orders of the Appellate Division in the above-entitled proceedings should be affirmed, with costs.
The city police department and its director of personnel, without objecting to the authority of the city Civil Service Commission to hear the matter de nova, participated in an evidentiary hearing before the Commission on Ms. Garayua’s *972disqualification, presenting their own witnesses and cross-examining Ms. Garayua’s. Moreover, even after the Commission’s decision was announced, the police department and personnel director continued to treat the Commission as…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Department of Personnel v. New York City Civil Service CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Krasowski v. State Education DeparmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Norwood Pub, Inc. v. State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- City of New York v. New York City Civil Service CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- Segrue v. City of SchenectadyNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.