Segrue v. City of Schenectady

*759OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and respondent’s determination of dismissal reinstated.

In a prior article 78 proceeding challenging petitioner’s dismissal from his position as purchasing agent for respondent City of Schenectady, the Appellate Division sustained respondent’s determination that petitioner had improperly altered or permitted to be altered a bid for the purchase of city property (see, Matter of Segrue v City of Schenectady, 132 AD2d 270). That court found substantial evidence to support the determination of the Hearing…