Texido v. S & R Car Rentals Toronto, Ltd.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied plaintiffs’ motion to set aside the jury verdict in favor of defendants in this personal injury action. “A motion to set aside a jury verdict of no cause of action should not be granted unless the preponderance of the evidence in favor of the moving party is so great that the verdict could not have been reached upon any fair interpretation of the evidence” (Dannick v County of Onondaga, 191 AD2d 963, 964; see, Cohen v Hallmark Cards, 45 NY2d 493, 498-499). In this case, the jury could rationally conclude…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cohen v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Dannick v. County of OnondagaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Bolles v. County of CattaraugusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Travelers Insurance v. Howard E. Conrad, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Gonzalez v. ChalpinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Weinstock v. HandlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Esterle v. DellayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Mono v. Peter Pan Bus Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Savage v. SnellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Savage v. SnellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.