Legal Opinion

United States v. Frank D'angelo, Richard Delcazal and Wade A. Freman

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 16, 1979No. 78-5737PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHARLES CLARK, Circuit Judge:

The appellants, Frank D’Angelo, Richard Delcazal and Wade A. Freman, were tried together and convicted on different offenses arising from a scheme to distribute marijuana. 1 We affirm the convictions.

Appellants Delcazal and Freman raise two issues on appeal. First, they argue that the district court erred in allowing the government’s chief witness — a co-conspirator not indicted by the grand jury — to testify concerning a marijuana delivery that was allegedly intended originally for Delcazal but was diverted to another buyer. No objection was made to the testimony…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Sparf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Arthur Wayne Carson, Cross-Appellee v. Officer Polley, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  2. Washington v. StricklandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  3. United States v. Joseph Lichenstein and Leo BellaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  4. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. James Scott Mann William M. Moore, Defendants-Appellants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. Alberto Montes-Cardenas, A/K/A Tony CamposCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API