United States v. Frank D'angelo, Richard Delcazal and Wade A. Freman
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CHARLES CLARK, Circuit Judge:
The appellants, Frank D’Angelo, Richard Delcazal and Wade A. Freman, were tried together and convicted on different offenses arising from a scheme to distribute marijuana. 1 We affirm the convictions.
Appellants Delcazal and Freman raise two issues on appeal. First, they argue that the district court erred in allowing the government’s chief witness — a co-conspirator not indicted by the grand jury — to testify concerning a marijuana delivery that was allegedly intended originally for Delcazal but was diverted to another buyer. No objection was made to the testimony…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Sparf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Arthur Wayne Carson, Cross-Appellee v. Officer Polley, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Washington v. StricklandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Joseph Lichenstein and Leo BellaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. James Scott Mann William M. Moore, Defendants-Appellants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Alberto Montes-Cardenas, A/K/A Tony CamposCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.