Legal Opinion
Memphis Natural Gas Co. v. Gully
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Decided September 17, 1934No. 450PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLMES, District Judge.
There is presented by this hill and application for preliminary injunction a similar claim of tax exemption to that just decided in Interstate Natural Gas Company v. J. B. Gully, State Tax Collector (D. C.) 8 F. Supp. 174. This plaintiff is a foreign corporation which applied for, and was granted, a five-year exemption from ad valorem taxation. The exemption was approved by the Attorney General of Mississippi as being in conformity to its laws and Constitution. On the faith of the grant, which has never been repealed, the plaintiff entered the state as “a new enterprise…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Prentis v. Atlantic Coast Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pennsylvania v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Matthews v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. SchnaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Commissioners of Road Improvement District No. 2 v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Douglas Oil Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Chester C. Fosgate Co. v. KirklandDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1937
- Gully v. Memphis Natural Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936