Legal Opinion

Douglas Oil Co. v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 27, 1935No. 7828PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCLENDON, Chief Justice.

Questions arising in this cause have been twice certified to the Supreme Court. Questions embodied in the first certificate were answered. 122 Tex. 369, 61 S.W.(2d) 804. The second certificate was dismissed; the order reciting that the dismissal was “because it certified the whole case to this Court.” In a per curiam opinion [(Tex. Sup.) 76 S.W.(2d) 1043, 1044], the following additional reason is given; “The certificate calls upon the Supreme Court to give an advisory opinion, which is not permitted. Morrow v. Corbin, 122 Tex. 553, 62 S.W.(2d) 641.” Since a proper…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Perry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Nashville, C. & St. LR Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Morrow v. CorbinTexas Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Willing v. Chicago Auditorium Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. United Services Life Insurance Company v. DelaneyTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Federal Royalty Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Scheibel v. PavlakSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. Oakley v. KentCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  5. Puretex Lemon Juice, Inc. v. California Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1959

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API