Legal Opinion

Rathnaw v. Hatch

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1937No. Docket No. 104, Calendar No. 39,588PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

Defendant Hatch is a dentist with offices located at 2297 East Forest avenue in the city of Detroit. For some time he had been a tenant from year to year of the First National Bank and later from the receivers in charge of the property. During the early part of the year 1936, plaintiff negotiated with the bank receivers for the purchase of this property; but later with the aid of defendant, plaintiff procured a 10-year lease to begin August 1, 1936. On or about September 1,1936, plaintiff served upon defendant a 30-day notice to vacate the premises; and upon refusal, summary proceedings were…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McGuffie v. CarterMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Gardner v. Detroit Street Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Leduke v. BarnettMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  4. De War v. JuettMichigan Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Arrand v. GrahamMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Talbot v. US Bank National AssociationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API