Legal Opinion

Leduke v. Barnett

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1881PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Mecosta. Proceedings under Comp. L. ch. 211 to recover possession of lands. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

Leduke commenced this action before a circuit court commissioner to recover possession of certain leased premises, and it was appealed to the circuit court. The hearing was before the circuit judge who made a special finding of facts and gave judgment in favor of the respondent. Leduke asks a reversal on writ of error. The only-question raised is upon the sufficiency of the facts to support the judgment rendered against him. Hence the point involved is whether the facts found were such as to entitle him to a judgment. Because if they were not, the decision in favor of his opponent was a…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Denecke v. Henry F. Miller & SonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  2. Easley Coal Co. v. Brush Creek Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Ross v. HanerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. De War v. JuettMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Rathnaw v. HatchMichigan Supreme Court · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API