Diehl v. Wilmot Castle Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.
The subject of dispute confronting us is whether the testimony of the husband as to the performance by husband and wife of automobile driving experiments, in the presence of each other, at or about a public hospital entrance, for the purpose of the wife becoming more knowledgeable relative to the civil case in which she was then serving as a juror, is privileged under R. C. 2317.-02, where such testimony is sought for the purpose of showing misconduct on the part of the juror wife.
We observe at the outset that the plaintiffs in this lawsuit are entitled to certain substantive rights,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Wicker v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1948
- Dick v. HyerOhio Supreme Court · 1916
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. SchiebelOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. YarbroughOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. YarbroughOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. KehnOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- Western Fire Truck, Inc. v. Emergency One, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.