Legal Opinion

Berlangieri v. Running Elk Corp.

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided May 20, 2002No. 21,807PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ALARID, Judge.

{1} This case requires us to decide whether New Mexico courts will enforce an exculpatory agreement purporting to relieve the commercial operator of a recreational premises from liability for failure to exercise ordinary care to protect its patrons from risks of serious physical injury. We conclude that such exculpatory agreements are unenforceable because commercial operators of recreational premises are subject to a non-dis-claimable duty to exercise ordinary care to protect patrons from foreseeable risks of physical injury or death.

BACKGROUND

{2} Defendants operate The…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Trujillo v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Dalury v. S-K-I, Ltd.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  3. Trujillo v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State Ex Rel. Udall v. Colonial Penn InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Hiett v. Lake Barcroft Community Ass'nSupreme Court of Virginia · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Wilks v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Schreibvogel v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Berlangieri v. Running Elk Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Whitney v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  5. K.R. Swerdfeger Construction, Inc. v. Board of RegentsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API