Legal Opinion

Harrington v. Empire Const. Co.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided March 3, 1947No. Civil Action No. 2413PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM C. COLEMAN,

District Judge.

This is a case arising under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 201-219.

As a result of the original hearing the plaintiff was found to be entitled, under the Act, to recover from the defendant additional compensation on account of wages, and, since the parties were unable to agree on the sum due, the case was referred to a Special Master for the purpose of taking testimony and determining the correct amount. He has reported his findings to the Court, to which both parties have filed certain exceptions. The matter is now before the Court on…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. McLeod v. ThrelkeldSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Walling v. Youngerman-Reynolds Hardwood Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Reed v. MurpheyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
  2. Pietrzycki v. Heights Tower Serv., Inc.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2017
  3. Mullins v. Howard County, Md.District Court, D. Maryland · 1990
  4. Diaz Mancilla v. Chesapeake Outdoor Services, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024
  5. Reed v. MurpheyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API