Legal Opinion

E.C. Corp. v. Kent

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided December 23, 1992No. 2910397PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a workmen's compensation case.

Melvin Randall Kent sued for workmen's compensation benefits because of injuries he claimed to have suffered while employed by E.C. Corporation (employer).

After an ore tenus proceeding, the trial court entered an order finding that Kent had suffered an on-the-job injury which resulted in "a [permanent] loss of earning capacity and a vocational disability in the amount of thirty percent (30%) to the body as a whole." Accordingly, the trial court awarded benefits, an attorney's fee, and future medical expenses to Kent; hence, this appeal.

The employer's only…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Eastwood Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Bell v. DriskillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  3. Patrick v. FEMCO Southeast, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1990

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Drummond Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  2. Masterbrand Cabinets, Inc. v. JohnsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  3. Wolfe v. Dunlop Tire Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995
  4. Sullivan, Long & Hagerty, Inc. v. GoodwinCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994
  5. DRUMMOND CO., INC. v. PateCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API