Legal Opinion

Patrick v. FEMCO Southeast, Inc.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided May 30, 1990No. Civ. 7319PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

After an ore tenus proceeding, the trial court found that the employee had suffered a five percent loss of use of a scheduled member, his leg, as a result of a knee injury. The employee appeals.

The dispositive issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in finding that the knee injury resulted in only a five percent loss of use to the leg. See Ala. Code 1975, §25-5-57(a)(3)d.

The record, in pertinent part, reveals the following: The employee received an injury to his knee while in the line and scope of his employment. This injury required the employee to undergo knee surgery, physical…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Conagra v. WhiteCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  2. Jackson v. Dunlop Tire & Rubber Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Checker's Drive-In Restaurant v. BrockCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  2. Boise Cascade Corp. v. JacksonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
  3. Universal Forest Products v. EllenburgCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  4. E.C. Corp. v. KentCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  5. McCutcheon v. Champion Intern. Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API