State v. Rountree
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Memminger, J., Barnwell, November Term, 1907. Indictment against I. W. Rountree, James F. Rountree and Jim Stevens for larceny and receiving stolen goods. From verdict of guilty of receiving stolen goods as to I. W. and James F. Rountree, they appeal. cite: State must show defendants knew goods were stolen at the time received: 29 S'. C., 111. Oral argument.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Gary.
The appellants, I. W. Rountree and James F. Rountree, were found guilty of receiving stolen goods, knowing them to be stolen, under an indictment against them and Jim Stevens, containing two counts, the first charging grand larceny against the three defendants, and the second charging the two defendants, I. W. Rountree and James F. Rountree, with receiving stolen goods, knowing them to be stolen.
At the commencement of the trial, and before the introduction of testimony, a motion was made to require the solicitor to elect upon which of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. CrawfordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1893
- State v. JacobSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1889
3Cited by30 opinions
- State v. LyleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
- Kasle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
- Peterson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1914
- State v. NewmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- State v. SimonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.