Legal Opinion

Li Li v. Canberra Industries

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 27, 2012No. AC 32744PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BEACH, J.

The self-represented plaintiff, Li Li, appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendants, Canberra Industries, Packard BioScience (Packard), Perkin-Elmer Life Sciences, Darren Lee, Roberta Tyska (formerly Roberta Kuhn), Mark Schmeizl, Wayne Richardson, Eugene Della Vecchia, Richard McKeman and Emery G. Olcott. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of the defendants as to her common-law and statutory claims of wrongful discharge. We agree and reverse in part the judgment of the trial…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Elizabeth Gordon v. New York City Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  3. Espinal v. GoordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  4. Sheets v. Teddy's Frosted Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  5. Daley v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hagen v. Siouxland Obstetrics & Gynecology, P.C.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2013
  2. Howard v. Flagstar BankDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
  3. Killin v. Buttercup CT, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2025
  4. Morrissey-Manter v. Saint Francis Hospital & Medical CenterConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  5. Morrissey-Manter v. Saint Francis Hospital & Medical CenterConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API