Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Morrissey-Manter v. Saint Francis Hospital & Medical Center

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 28, 2016No. AC37628Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partAlvord, J.

I agree with parts I, III and IV of the majority opinion, which conclude that the trial court properly rendered summary judgment on the claims of the plaintiff, Annemarie Morrissey-Manter, that the defendants, Saint Francis Hospital and Medical Center, and Saint Francis Care, Inc., improperly terminated her employment because she had an implied contractual agreement that prohibited her discharge without cause, that the defendants breached the covenant of good faith and fair dealing because she was discharged without cause, and that the defendants withheld evidence and destroyed evidence that…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Sheets v. Teddy's Frosted Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  3. Wagner v. International Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
  4. Parsons v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  5. Thibodeau v. Design Group One Architects, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API