Legal Opinion
State v. Kuhn
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 21, 1986PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
213 N.J. Super. 275 (1986)
517 A.2d 162
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
ROY E. KUHN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued September 24, 1986.
Decided October 21, 1986.
Before Judges FURMAN and DREIER.
William H. Tobolsky argued the cause for appellant (Alfred A. Slocum, Public Defender, attorney; William H. Tobolsky, Designated Counsel, on the brief).
Barbara A. Forte, Assistant Prosecutor Camden County argued the cause for respondent (Samuel Asbell, Prosecutor Camden County, attorney; Barbara A. Forte, of counsel and on letter brief).
The opinion…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. EldersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
- State v. StovallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- State v. SotoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
- State v. DossNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
- State ex rel. J.G.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.