Legal Opinion

Edwards v. John Smith & Sons

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 7, 1980No. 8010IC206PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

Defendants do not question the sufficiency of the evidence to support the findings of fact, but rather the sufficiency of the findings of fact to support the conclusion of law that plaintiff has experienced a change of condition under N.C.G.S. 97-47 from the time of Deputy Commissioner Denson’s original award on 27 January 1976.

N.C.G.S. 97-47 authorized the Industrial Commission to review and, in its discretion, modify previous awards on the grounds of a change of condition. As stated in Gaddy v. Kern, 32 N.C. App. 671, 673, 233 S.E. 2d 609, 611 (1977), a change of condition…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pratt v. Central Upholstery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Swaney v. GEORGE NEWTON CONSTRUCTION COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  3. Gaddy v. CJ Kern, ContractorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McLean v. Roadway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Calloway v. Shuford MillsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Harmon v. Public Service of North Carolina, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Grantham v. Transp. TechnologiesNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2008
  5. Ward v. Floors PerfectNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API