Copeland v. Burk
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Oklahoma County: Geo. W. Clark, Judge. Action by J. A. Copeland, against J. M. Burk and another. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
EDWARDS, C.
The parties will be referred to as plaintiff and defendant, according to their positions in the lower court. The plaintiff sued the defendant and one E. S. Messengill in the district court upon a negotiable promissory note executed by said Messengill to the defendant. J. M. Burk, payee, and by the said defendant .transferred to the plaintiff by memorandum upon the back of the note in these words. *‘I transfer my right, title and interest in same. J. M. Burk.” The petition is in the ordinary form, alleging the making of the noto, itstransfer for a valuable consideration…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Markey v. CoreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Citizens National Bank v. WaltonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1898
- Hailey v. FalconerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858
- Sears v. Lantz & BatesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
- Maine Trust & Banking Co. v. ButlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Implement Credit Corp. v. ElsingerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- Prichard v. StrikeUtah Supreme Court · 1926
- Divelbiss v. BurnsMississippi Supreme Court · 1931
- Fay v. WitteNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Coulter v. StewartArizona Supreme Court · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.