Legal Opinion

Sanders, Bruin, Coll & Worley, P.A. v. McKay Oil Corp.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1997No. 23479PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BACA, Justice.

1. Upon certification from the Court of Appeals pursuant to NMSA1978, Section 34-5-14 (Repl.Pamp.1996), Roy L. McKay and his corporate entities (collectively referred to as “McKay”) seek review of a district court order granting summary judgment in favor of Appellees Fisher, Worley, Coll, and Kraft. This Court now considers whether the trial court properly granted the motion. We hold that the summary judgment motion should not have been granted, and therefore we reverse and remand the case to the trial court for hearing.

I

2. During the 1990’s, Roy McKay, owner of McKay Oil…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Willis v. MaverickTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Koenig v. PerezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Bourgeous v. Horizon Healthcare Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Louis Lobato v. Pay Less Drug Stores, Inc., a Corporation Abe B. Cohen, James L. Grady, Charles Finke, and Burt RosenburgCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
  5. State v. CummingsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Spencer v. Paul Barber, Barber & Borg, L.L.C.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Amica Mutual Insurance v. McRostieNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Richter v. Van AmbergDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API