Legal Opinion

Transfer Realty Co. v. Lichfield

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1934No. 5293PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHRISTENSEN, District Judge.

This action was brought to foreclose a certain mortgage covering property in Provo City, Utah. Plaintiff in its complaint sets out jurisdictional facts and alleges the execution of the note and mortgage sued upon, ownership thereof by plaintiff, default of the mortgagors, right of plaintiff to sue, and prays for judgment on the note and decree of foreclosure of the mortgage.

Defendants answering admit the jurisdictional facts and the execution of the note and mortgage, deny default in payment, and affirmatively allege that said note and the mortgage have been paid…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harrison v. Auto Securities Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Hilton v. SloanUtah Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Heavy v. Commercial National Bank of OgdenUtah Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. SFR, INC. v. Comtrol, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2008
  2. G. Eugene England Foundation v. Smith's Food King No. 6Utah Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Stanley v. StanleyUtah Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API