Legal Opinion

Matthews v. Auto Owners Mutual Insurance

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided February 25, 1988No. 1-86-0087PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

WISEMAN, Chief Judge.

Defendant Auto Owners Mutual Insurance Company (Auto Owners) has moved the Court, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c), *288for summary judgment against plaintiff Dexter Matthews (Matthews). For the reasons stated below, the Court finds that summary judgment is inappropriate in this case, and denies Auto Owners’ motion.

I. Factual Background

Sometime in January, 1986, Auto Owners issued a homeowners insurance policy to Matthews, insuring both his home and personal property. The policy also provided for additional living expenses in the event that Matthews’ home ever became…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. 60 Ivy Street Corporation (86-5500), and Coldwell Banker Commercial Group, Inc., (86-5517) v. R.C. Alexander and Doris AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  3. Insurance Cos. v. ScalesTennessee Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Helen Corinne Scales Trice v. Commercial Union Assurance Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
  5. McConkey v. Continental Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wassom v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
  2. Love v. Allstate Vehicle & Prop. Ins. Co.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API