Legal Opinion
Jean-Baptiste v. Booz Allen Hamilton
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 21, 2022No. Civil Action No. 2022-1499Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HAROLD JEAN-BAPTISTE, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:22-cv-01499 (TNM) BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Harold Jean-Baptiste, proceeding pro se, sues his former employer, Booz Allen Hamilton for employment discrimination under Title VII and violations of federal and state statutes. Booz Allen moves to dismiss Jean-Baptiste’s Complaint for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6) and for improper venue under Rule 12(b)(3). The Court will grant in part Booz Allen’s motion under Rule 12(b)(6) because Jean-Baptiste’s…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.