Legal Opinion

Funsten v. Muse

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 3, 1952No. 34148Published

1Opinion of the CourtCarlisle, J.

Where the holder of a duly recorded bill of sale to a certain crop of peanuts, who had furnished supplies to produce the crop, brought an action of trover to recover the value of the crop from a landlord on whose property the crop was produced by a tenant renter, and, upon the trial of the case, it appeared that the defendant landlord had a landlord’s lien on the crop for rent and for supplies furnished (the question of the furnishing of supplies by the landlord being in dispute), and under one theory of the evidence, the jury was authorized to find that the landlord’s farm superintendent,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Helton v. ShellnutSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  2. Hamilton v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
  3. Foster v. ThomasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API