People ex rel. Thomas v. Superintendent of Arthur Kill Correctional Facility
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In the absence of a convincing demonstration to the contrary, it is presumed that the New York State Board of Parole acted properly in accordance with statutory requirements (see, People ex rel. Herbert v New York State Bd. of Parole, 97 AD2d 128, 133, appeal withdrawn 62 NY2d 617; Matter of Mackall v New York State Bd. of Parole, 91 AD2d 1023, 1024, lv denied 58 NY2d 609; Matter of Abrams v New York State Bd. of Parole, 88 AD2d 951). Here, the petitioner failed to make a convincing showing that the Board relied upon incomplete and erroneous information in rendering its determination (see,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People ex rel. Herbert v. New York State Board of ParoleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Davis v. New York State Division of ParoleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Ristau v. HammockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Ganci v. HammockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Bacon v. HammockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- King v. New York State Division of ParoleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- McLain v. New York State Division of ParoleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Gerena v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Hall v. New York State Executive Department, Division of ParoleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Robles v. DennisonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.