Legal Opinion
In Re Harmack Produce Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 8, 1942No. 77465PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIFKIND, District Judge.
The bankruptcy referee has denied the application of the City of New York, made after the expiration of the statutory time limit, for leave to file its proof of claim and to have it “deemed due and timely filed”. The City of New York seeks a review of the referee’s order.
The facts are not in dispute. The time to file claims as of right expired on May 26, 1941. No claim had prior thereto been filed by the petitioner. Its first attempt to file a proof of claim occurred on January 6, 1942. The referee refused to accept it. Thereafter, the petitioner made an application…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- New York v. Irving Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Williams v. RiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1929
- People of New York v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
- In re PiersonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Milando v. PerroneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- In Re Imperial Sheet Metal, Inc.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1973
- In Re Martin Edsel, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1963
- Newberg v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
- In re Lewis J. Glazer, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.