Legal Opinion

Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Tacoma Junk Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1926No. 19630. Department OnePublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

This action was instituted hy respondent against appellants to recover the value, alleged to be in the sum of $500, of a lot of rails and rail fittings claimed to have been converted by appellants to their own use.

Appellants denied the title of respondent to the rails, claiming that they had belonged to one Wilson, from whom they purchased them. Upon the trial both sides moved for a directed verdict, but the trial court directed judgment for respondent, submitting the question of damages to the jury, which found for respondent in the sum of $384.49.

Wilson, from whom the rails were purchased,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jones v. Van BochoveMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Roby v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Roby v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. McClain v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  5. Fidalgo Island Shingle Co. v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Gildon v. Simon Property Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Gildon v. Simon Property Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Texas & N. O. R. v. SchoenfeldTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Howard v. EdgrenWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  5. O'Brien v. BestIdaho Supreme Court · 1948

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API