United States ex rel. Jackson Ornamental Iron & Bronze Works v. Brent
District Court, W.D. South Carolina
At Raw. Action by the .United States, for the use of the Jackson Ornamental Iron & Bronze Works, and by the United States, for the use of the Conkling Armstrong Terra Cotta Company, against W. J. Brent and others. On exceptions to master’s report.
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, District Judge.
This is an action brought on the bond of a contractor under the act of Congress of 1894, as amended by the act of February 24, 1905, to subject the principal and the surety to the payment of sums due to persons who furnished labor or materials in the construction of a public building at Gaffney, S. C., payment therefor not having been made. Proceedings were filed July 23, 1914, for the use of the Jackson Ornamental Iron & Bronze Works, claiming to be a party entitled to the benefit of the bond. There have been a number of interventions, setting up accounts for labor or…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Hill v. American Surety Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Columbia Digger Co. v. RectorDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1914
- Bankers' Surety Co. of Cleveland v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1915
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. EichelCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1915
- United States ex rel. Port Blakely Mill Co. v. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1912
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Sherman v. Carter Constr. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- F. H. McGraw & Co. v. Milcor Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Fawcett v. Nampa & Meridian Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1920
- Dysart Corp. v. Seaboard Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- American Oil Co. v. Brown Paving Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1969
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.