Simpson Electric Corp. v. Leucadia, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Simons, J.
This appeal presents two questions: first, whether State courts enjoy concurrent jurisdiction with Federal courts over civil claims brought under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) (18 USC §§ 1961-1968) and, second, whether defendant Leucadia has stated a cause of action for damages under the act in the fifth counterclaim of its amended answer. The Appellate Division answered the first question in the negative and thus did not pass on the second. We affirm but for different reasons. We hold that State courts enjoy concurrent…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Charles Dowd Box Co. v. CourtneySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Tafflin v. LevittSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Schulman v. Chase Manhattan BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- County of Suffolk v. Long Island Lighting Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1989
- Sanders v. RosenNew York Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. PymmNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.