Legal Opinion

Fleming v. Pellum

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1926No. Application No. 14731PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Greenwood

The jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is invoked by this application to determine the conflict between the decision in this case that a bill of exceptions or a statement of facts, in so far as it relates to testimony taken on a motion for new trial, comes within the terms of Art. 2073 of the Revised Statutes of 1911, now Art. 2246, and the contrary decision in Smith v. Texas Power & Light Company, 206 S. W., 119.

Because of the conflict in the decisions of the Courts of Civil Appeals as to whether Art. 2246, formerly 2073, authorized the perpetuation of testimony on motions for new trial, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stephenson v. NicholsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  2. Temple Hill Development Co. v. LindholmTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  3. Reed v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  4. Smith v. Texas Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  5. Double v. SawtellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. San Antonio Paper Co. v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  2. United States Fire Ins. Co. of New York v. FarrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. Langford v. MoodyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API