Legal Opinion

Pens. Plan Guide P 23919j T.A. Musick and James Character v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided April 23, 1996No. 95-6277PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiffs, TA Musick and James Character, appeal from the district court’s order granting the defendant, Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., summary judgment. In 1994, almost four years after Goodyear had laid them off from their jobs, the plaintiffs filed suits claiming that the lay-offs were motivated by Goodyear’s desire to deprive them of retirement benefits, in violation of section 510 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1140. They sought back pay and benefits as well as retirement eligibility credit for the time they were laid-off. The district court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Bill Clark, Herbert Futch, Austin Hurst, Louis Sliker and William Barrineau v. Coats & Clark, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  3. Byrd v. MacPapers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
  4. ConAgra, Inc. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Jakimas v. Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  2. Blue Cross & Blue Shield v. SandersCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  3. Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23,924 Barbara Carol Godfrey v. Bellsouth Telecommunica- Tions, Inc. South Central BellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  4. Harrison v. Digital Health PlanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
  5. Morris v. RocheDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API