Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Department of Transportation v. Blevins

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 6, 2009No. COA08-266Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJackson, Judge

I concur in sections II, III, and IV of the majority’s opinion. However, I respectfully dissent from the majority’s holding in section I because I believe it departs from precedent established by our Supreme Court in Barnes v. Highway Commission, 257 N.C. 507, 126 S.E.2d 732 (1962) as well as this Court’s precedent in City of Concord v. Stafford, 173 N.C. App. 201, 618 S.E.2d 276 (2005). In view of Barnes and Stafford, I would hold that the trial court abused its discretion by admitting evidence regarding the effect of the median on the diminution in value of Blevins’ property.

The facts in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barnes v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Department of Transportation v. M.M. Fowler, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  3. City of Concord v. StaffordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API