Legal Opinion
No. 17657
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 1, 1962No. 452Published
1Opinion of the Court
309 F.2d 452
Peter HOLZ, Petitioner,
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,* Respondent.
* Under the new statute (Public Law 87-301, 75 Stat. 651, 8
U.S.C. 1105a(a)(3)) actions of this type must be brought
against the Immigration and Naturalization Service as
Respondent. We have, therefore, changed the title of
proceedings in this Court from 'Peter Holz, Petitioner
v.
George Rosenberg, District Director, Immigration and
Naturalization, etc., et al., Respondents' to
'Peter Holz, Petitioner v. Immigration
and Naturalization Service, Respondent'.
No. 17657.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
Nov.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Constantinos Roumeliotis and Panayota Roumeliotis, His Wife v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1962
- Francesco Foti, A/K/A Frank Foti v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Jakov Blagaic, Plaintiff-Petitioner v. W. T. Flagg, District Director, Chicago District Immigration and Naturalization Service, Defendant-RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1962
- Bedrettin Cakmar v. Richard C. Hoy, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization Service at Los Angeles, CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Mai Kai Fong, Also Known as Yee Wing Young v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.