Legal Opinion
Bedrettin Cakmar v. Richard C. Hoy, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization Service at Los Angeles, California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 23, 1959No. 16153_1PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARNES, Circuit Judge.
The Special Inquiry Officer hearing this matter for the Immigration and Naturalization Service commented: “This case is a classical example of the circumvention, through dilatory tactics, of the prompt execution of the immigration laws of this country.” We completely agree.
Appellant Bedrettin Cakmar, his wife, and three children, all citizens of Turkey, entered the United States from Turkey on July 7th, 1954, as temporary thirty-day visitors, with the admitted intent of “losing themselves” in the United States and delaying their deportation as long as possible. They were…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Berman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Escoe v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Jay v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- United States Ex Rel. Dolenz v. ShaughnessyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- United States ex rel. Leong Choy Moon v. ShaughnessyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Chris Dunat v. L. W. Hurney, District Director of Immigration, PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
- Woodrow W Cape v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Hamish Scott MacKay Apellant v. Eugene D. McAlexander Acting District Director, District 31, Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Tang v. District Director of the U. S. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1969
- Peter Holz v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.