Legal Opinion

Rogers v. State

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 2011No. DA 10-0319PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Morris

¶1 Rusty Rogers (Rogers) appeals from an order of the Eighteenth Judicial District Court, Gallatin County, denying his petition for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

¶2 We review the issues on appeal:

¶3 Did Rogers receive ineffective assistance of counsel during his trial and on direct appeal?

¶4 Did prosecutorial misconduct violate Rogers’s due process rights ?

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶5 Rogers hired attorney Suzanne Marshall (Marshall) to represent him after the State of Montana (State) charged him with two counts of sexual assault for touching the vaginal areas of his co-worker’s two…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. GeymanMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Hagen v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. BrodniakMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. St. GermainMontana Supreme Court · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. Danny SartainMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  2. St. Germain v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Bomar v. State of MTMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Michael Miller v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Rose v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2013

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API