Legal Opinion

Chesnutt v. Morris

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 14, 1931No. 6 Div. 721PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The case of Morris v. Card, post, p. 254, 135 So. 340, rules this case.

In dismissing the bill, the trial court, no doubt, had in mind the question of a scrambling possession. This was before the decision in Bell v. Propst, 220 Ala. 641, 127 So. 212. When the fence was built by the vendee, alleged to have been erected by the original owner, his possession as vendee authorized him to file a bill to redeem. Section 3108, Code. That is, so long as the tax purchaser does not have the actual possession, of the property, though he has the right by valid tax deed, the true and original owner or his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bell v. PropstSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  2. Burdett v. RossiterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  3. Georgia Loan & Trust Co. v. Washington Realty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  4. Green v. StephensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  5. Morris v. CardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Tensaw Land & Timber Co. v. RiversSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  2. Moorer v. ChastangSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  3. Standard Contractors Supply Co. v. ScotchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  4. Gordon v. McLemoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  5. Brunson v. BaileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API