Legal Opinion
At & T TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. Royston
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided March 23, 1989No. 87CA1975PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STERNBERG, Judge.
Respondent, AT & T Technologies, Inc. (AT & T), seeks review of an adverse order of the Colorado Civil Rights Commission (Commission), finding that it discriminated against an employee because of his handicap, and requiring it to reinstate the employee to his former position with back pay and benefits. We affirm.
Complainant, Joe Royston, had worked as an installer for AT & T and its predecessor beginning in 1969. At the time of his discharge, in April 1985, Royston had been classified as an Index 3 installer for ten years. In this classification, Royston was required to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- School Bd. of Nassau Cty. v. ArlineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- George Dunbar Prewitt, Jr. v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Gardner v. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Philip Bentivegna v. United States Department of Labor, and City of Los Angeles, Real Party in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Umberfield v. SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 11, ETC.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Stone v. St. Joseph's Hosp. of ParkersburgWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2000
- Coski v. City & County of Denver Ex Rel. Denver Police DepartmentColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
- Healion v. Great-West Life Assurance Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1993
- Quicker v. American v. MuellerDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1989
- Lipp v. StateColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.