Legal Opinion

Campbell Et Vir. v. Pittsburgh

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 27, 1944No. Appeals, 125 and 126PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

In this action in trespass for injuries to the wife-plaintiff from a fall on a city street, Equitable Gas Company was brought in as an additional defendant. The jury found in favor of plaintiffs against the City of Pittsburgh alone. This appeal questions the refusal of the lower court to enter judgment for the city n. o. v.

In the light of the verdict, these facts appear: Murphy’s Five and Ten Cent Store in Pittsburgh fronts on Fifth Avenue and extends westwardly along McMasters Way. There are doorways in the store building for the use of customers opening on both streets.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bisson v. John B. Kelly, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Rugart v. Keebler-Weyl Baking Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Mars v. Meadville Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Elliott v. Allegheny County Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  5. Strobel v. ParkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lewis v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Jerdon v. SirulnikSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Jerdon v. SirulnikSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Lewis v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API