Legal Opinion
Ligiecki v. E. I. Dupont DeNemours & Co.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided July 9, 1942No. 745PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNIGHT, District Judge.
Two motions are before the Court for its decision. One is a motion by the defendant for a summary judgment. The other is by the plaintiff for leave to amend his complaint.
Plaintiff worked for the defendant at its Niagara Falls, New York, plant for a period commencing in June, 1933, and ending in April, 1941. This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly caused by the harmful dust and vapors in the atmosphere of the plant. It was begun by the service of a summons and complaint on July 28, 1941. The complaint pleads a single cause of action. Among…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bank of Columbia v. OkelySupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Schmidt v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Terry v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Koshkonong v. BurtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Matter of Goldberg v. 954 Marcy Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Uta-Carbon Coal Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1943
- Conner v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1943