Legal Opinion

Creamer v. Troiano

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 2, 1972No. 2 CA-CIV 1076PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRUCKER, Chief Judge.

The lawsuit here appealed was an action for personal injuries brought by Marshall Troiano against Virgil D. Creamer and Blanche Creamer, husband and wife, and Kathy Jean Samoyoa, Mrs. Creamer’s ■daughter by a previous marriage. The trial judge granted the plaintiff’s motion for a directed verdict on the issue of liability. The family purpose doctrine applied .■so that any negligence of Miss Samoyoa was imputed to her mother and stepfather. The damages question was tried to the jury and a verdict returned in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $1,500. Judgment was entered…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pima County v. BilbyArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Railway Exp. Agency, Inc. v. MalloryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
  3. Hardy v. Southern Pacific Employees AssociationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  4. Zadro v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  5. Wilkinson v. MazurCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Creamer v. TroianoArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Begay v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Jackson v. MearigCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  4. Romero v. StinesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API