Legal Opinion
In re Urethane Antitrust Litigation
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided January 14, 2016No. Civ. No. 2:08-5169 (WJM-MF)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*358OPINION
WILLIAM J. MARTINI, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.
This is an antitrust action in which Plaintiffs accuse The Dow Chemical Company (“Dow”) of colluding with other businesses in order to artificially inflate the prices of urethane chemicals.- This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ motion in limine to limit the testimony of one of Dow’s expert witnesses, Dr. Kenneth G. Elzinga. For the reasons stated below, Plaintiffs’ motion will be DENIED, subject to. the : Court reserving its decision, on whether Dr. Elzinga may- opine on assessments made, by the parties’ damages experts.
I.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. John W. DowningCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard Pcb LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Pineda v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- David Oddi v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re Delta/Airtran Baggage Fee Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2017
- Gillon v. BernsteinDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2016
- UNITED STATES FOR THE USE OF COLORADO CUSTOM ROCK CORP. v. G&C FAB-CON, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024