Legal Opinion

Massey v. Ford

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 7, 1981No. 14710PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MARVIN, Judge.

After this partition action had been submitted for a decision, the trial court noticed that plaintiff had failed to join indispensable parties, dismissed the action, and later denied plaintiff’s application for a new trial, which, if granted, allegedly would have allowed plaintiff to remove or cure the defect. Plaintiff appeals. We reverse and remand. CCP 641, 646, 927, 931, 934, 1973.

Unless the contrary has been agreed, each of the co-owners of a thing has the absolute right to demand its division by the action of partition. CC Art. 1289; Fabacher v. Fabacher, 214 La. 940, 39…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Succession of RobinsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
  2. Succession of GibsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
  3. Fabacher v. FabacherSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State, Department of Social Services, Office of Family Support ex rel. Munson v. WashingtonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API