Massey v. Ford
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
MARVIN, Judge.
After this partition action had been submitted for a decision, the trial court noticed that plaintiff had failed to join indispensable parties, dismissed the action, and later denied plaintiff’s application for a new trial, which, if granted, allegedly would have allowed plaintiff to remove or cure the defect. Plaintiff appeals. We reverse and remand. CCP 641, 646, 927, 931, 934, 1973.
Unless the contrary has been agreed, each of the co-owners of a thing has the absolute right to demand its division by the action of partition. CC Art. 1289; Fabacher v. Fabacher, 214 La. 940, 39…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Succession of RobinsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
- Succession of GibsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
- Fabacher v. FabacherSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
3Cited by1 opinion
- State, Department of Social Services, Office of Family Support ex rel. Munson v. WashingtonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999