Legal Opinion

Independence County v. Pfizer, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided February 11, 2008No. 1:07CV00033-WRWPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

WM. R. WILSON, JR., District Judge.

Pending is Defendants’ Joint Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. No. 43). Plaintiffs have responded (Doc. No. 53) and Defendants have replied (Doc. No. 62). For the reasons set out below, Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED.

1. BACKGROUND

Defendants produce and market cold remedies containing ephedrine and pseudoephedrine. 1 Aside from their legal use, ephedrine and pseudoephedrine are used in the production of methamphetamine, a highly addictive and very destructive illegal drug. 2 Plaintiffs allege that Defendants have known since at least 1986 that…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Vicki Westcott, Administratrix of the Estate of Arden Westcott, Deceased v. City of Omaha, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  3. Marcus Davis v. Calzona Hall, Director of Justice Services St. Louis County Jail Mohammad Alam, M.D. Spectrum Emergency CareCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  4. City of Chicago v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 2004
  5. District of Columbia v. Beretta, U.S.A., Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re Automotive Parts Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
  2. GEICO Corp. v. Autoliv, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2018
  3. Bateman v. Southern Development Corp. (In Re Bateman)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2010
  4. Coy's Honey Farm Inc v. Bayer CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2022
  5. State of Arkansas v. TikTok Inc.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API