Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Safe Harbor Water Power Corp. v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 12, 1941No. Nos. 907 and 908PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,:

The motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeals are dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Stratton v. St. Louis S. W. Ry. Co., 282 U. S. 10, 15-16; Virginian Ry. Co. v. United States, 272 U. S. 658, 671-672; Ex parte Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 279 U. S. 822. See Federal Power Act, § 313 (b) (Act of August 26,1935, c. 687, Title II, § 213,49 Stat. 847,860,16 U. S. C., § 825L (b)).

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Virginian Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Stratton v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Ex parte Atlantic Coast Line R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. The Chemehuevi Tribe of Indians v. Federal Power Commission, Arizona Public Service Company, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  2. George Copeland v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
  3. Safe Harbor Water Power Corp. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
  4. Ochsrider v. Reading CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. George Copeland v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API