Legal Opinion

Clayton v. Gardner

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1991No. 21260PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

In April of 1981, appellant Gene Clayton (Clayton) delivered to respondent Willard Gardner (Gardner) two promissory notes, one for $60,550.00 and another for $110,000.00. Each note provided that Clayton was to satisfy his debt to Gardner through a series of installment payments. In addition, each note contained an acceleration clause, which provided that, if Clayton should miss one of the installment payments, Gardner had the option of declaring the entire note due. Clayton never made a single payment on either of the notes. In 1988, therefore, Gardner activated the acceleration…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States of America, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Leon G. Feterl, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
  2. Trigg v. ArnottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. Moresi v. Far West Services, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1968
  4. Welty v. Western Bank of Las CrucesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Matter of Estate of LightColorado Court of Appeals · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by31 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. WasserburgerNevada Supreme Court · 2001
  2. 7321 Wandering Street Trust v. New Residential Mortgage Loan Trust 2020-NPL2District Court, D. Nevada · 2022
  3. Bank of America, N.A. v. Estrella II Homeowners AssociationDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020
  4. Collegium Fund LLC Series 10 v. Nationstar Mortgage LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2023
  5. Daisy Trust v. Federal National Mortgage AssociationDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2021

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API